https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777468 CESTAT, Chennai (AT) allowed most CENVAT credit claims by the appellant, setting aside demands on commission/collection-agent services, service-desk payments, insurance premiums for telecom equipment, land-survey fees, civil/electrical/erection/freight services for towers/shelters/PFBs, and manpower-recruitment services as eligible input services; the Tribunal agreed earlier CESTAT precedent supporting allowance. The demand of Rs.10,000 for packing/moving was upheld technically but the appellant had already reversed that credit, so no penalty was imposed. The appeal was disposed of with the impugned demands set aside except as noted. en-us Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Aug 2025 12:16:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777468 CESTAT, Chennai (AT) allowed most CENVAT credit claims by the appellant, setting aside demands on commission/collection-agent services, service-desk payments, insurance premiums for telecom equipment, land-survey fees, civil/electrical/erection/freight services for towers/shelters/PFBs, and manpower-recruitment services as eligible input services; the Tribunal agreed earlier CESTAT precedent supporting allowance. The demand of Rs.10,000 for packing/moving was upheld technically but the appellant had already reversed that credit, so no penalty was imposed. The appeal was disposed of with the impugned demands set aside except as noted. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777468