https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777471 CESTAT held the appeal to be within the condonable period and proceeded to decide on merits. The appellant's work - design, supply coordination, erection and commissioning of boilers - was classified as Consulting Engineer's Service. Input services and job work were found to relate to the output service, so CENVAT credit claimed on those input services was allowable. Because the credit was held admissible, demand of interest and penalties was unwarranted. The impugned order denying credit was set aside and the appeal allowed. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:06:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777471 CESTAT held the appeal to be within the condonable period and proceeded to decide on merits. The appellant's work - design, supply coordination, erection and commissioning of boilers - was classified as Consulting Engineer's Service. Input services and job work were found to relate to the output service, so CENVAT credit claimed on those input services was allowable. Because the credit was held admissible, demand of interest and penalties was unwarranted. The impugned order denying credit was set aside and the appeal allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777471