<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1663 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777475</link>
    <description>Redemption fine and penalty in a customs misdeclaration matter were held to be excessive because they were fixed without a proper market survey and without considering the margin of profit. The Tribunal applied the principle that quantum under section 125(1) and section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 must be proportionate and grounded in the relevant market value and profit element. Customs duty liability was left undisturbed, but the redemption fine and penalty were reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1663 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777475</link>
      <description>Redemption fine and penalty in a customs misdeclaration matter were held to be excessive because they were fixed without a proper market survey and without considering the margin of profit. The Tribunal applied the principle that quantum under section 125(1) and section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 must be proportionate and grounded in the relevant market value and profit element. Customs duty liability was left undisturbed, but the redemption fine and penalty were reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>