https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777486 ITAT, Hyderabad set aside the denial of regular registration under section 80G, finding that the assessing authority (CIT(E)) rejected the application routinely without addressing the appellant's explanation for delay or the merits. The tribunal observed ambiguity in the amended filing timelines and noted the applicant had sought condonation of delay under provisions effective 01.10.2024 and had filed evidence of charitable activities. The matter is remitted to CIT(E) for fresh consideration and hearing; the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777486 ITAT, Hyderabad set aside the denial of regular registration under section 80G, finding that the assessing authority (CIT(E)) rejected the application routinely without addressing the appellant's explanation for delay or the merits. The tribunal observed ambiguity in the amended filing timelines and noted the applicant had sought condonation of delay under provisions effective 01.10.2024 and had filed evidence of charitable activities. The matter is remitted to CIT(E) for fresh consideration and hearing; the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777486