<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1685 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777497</link>
    <description>ITAT, Surat (AT) held that where a firm&#039;s books reflect receipt of capital and partners confirm capital introduction, additions under s.68 cannot be made against the firm; if the assessing officer doubts a partner&#039;s creditworthiness, inquiries must target the partner, not the firm. Consequently, the AO&#039;s addition treating the partners&#039; investment in land as unexplained was disallowed, the CIT(A)&#039;s order was set aside, and the appeal grounds were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1685 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777497</link>
      <description>ITAT, Surat (AT) held that where a firm&#039;s books reflect receipt of capital and partners confirm capital introduction, additions under s.68 cannot be made against the firm; if the assessing officer doubts a partner&#039;s creditworthiness, inquiries must target the partner, not the firm. Consequently, the AO&#039;s addition treating the partners&#039; investment in land as unexplained was disallowed, the CIT(A)&#039;s order was set aside, and the appeal grounds were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>