<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1691 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777503</link>
    <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT held that penalty under s.271(1)(c) was not sustainable where the assessee made a voluntary disclosure during a search, no incriminating documents, unrecorded money, bullion, jewellery or books entries were seized, and the contemporaneous statement was later retracted with the retraction affidavit accepted by the AO. Explanation 5A to s.271(1)(c) was therefore inapplicable and the penalty was deleted, the appeal decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1691 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777503</link>
      <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT held that penalty under s.271(1)(c) was not sustainable where the assessee made a voluntary disclosure during a search, no incriminating documents, unrecorded money, bullion, jewellery or books entries were seized, and the contemporaneous statement was later retracted with the retraction affidavit accepted by the AO. Explanation 5A to s.271(1)(c) was therefore inapplicable and the penalty was deleted, the appeal decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>