<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1697 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777509</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN). The court held s.168 only issues binding instructions to tax authorities; breach may render orders invalid but not void, so they remain effective until set aside by a competent forum. Petitioners&#039; delay in approaching the court was unjustified; absence of DIN on portal service did not constitute non-service in law merely because of CBIC circulars, which are administrative instructions. On grounds of laches and failure to satisfactorily explain delay, interference was declined and petitions dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1697 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777509</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN). The court held s.168 only issues binding instructions to tax authorities; breach may render orders invalid but not void, so they remain effective until set aside by a competent forum. Petitioners&#039; delay in approaching the court was unjustified; absence of DIN on portal service did not constitute non-service in law merely because of CBIC circulars, which are administrative instructions. On grounds of laches and failure to satisfactorily explain delay, interference was declined and petitions dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>