https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463391 Process issued against the petitioner company under Section 27 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act was challenged as unreasoned and lacking application of mind. The Bombay High Court noted that an earlier order in proceedings against the co-accused directors had already set aside the same process order and remanded the matter to the Sessions Court for action in accordance with law. On that basis, the Court held that the process order could not be sustained against the petitioner company and set it aside, with the matter remitted to the trial court for further proceedings. en-us Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Aug 2025 21:57:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463391 Process issued against the petitioner company under Section 27 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act was challenged as unreasoned and lacking application of mind. The Bombay High Court noted that an earlier order in proceedings against the co-accused directors had already set aside the same process order and remanded the matter to the Sessions Court for action in accordance with law. On that basis, the Court held that the process order could not be sustained against the petitioner company and set it aside, with the matter remitted to the trial court for further proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463391