<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1898 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463394</link>
    <description>ITAT held the assessment order framed in the name of the amalgamating company to be bad in law and quashed it. The bench noted precedent from HC and SC decisions treating assessments in the name of an amalgamating entity as invalid where the merged/successor company should be assessed. The tribunal clarified the department may re-proceed to complete assessment in the name of the merged (successor) company in accordance with the IT Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:42:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1898 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463394</link>
      <description>ITAT held the assessment order framed in the name of the amalgamating company to be bad in law and quashed it. The bench noted precedent from HC and SC decisions treating assessments in the name of an amalgamating entity as invalid where the merged/successor company should be assessed. The tribunal clarified the department may re-proceed to complete assessment in the name of the merged (successor) company in accordance with the IT Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>