https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463389 A valid enquiry into a society's affairs under Section 25 required a compliant complaint or a lawful suo motu process by the Registrar, followed by notice and enquiry; a complaint that did not meet those statutory preconditions was invalid. The Registrar's report was unlawful because no notice was issued to the society or its executive committee and no proper enquiry was conducted, contrary to Section 25, Rule 8 and natural justice. An administrator could not be appointed under Section 27A(1)(c) on the basis of such a defective report, so the supersession order and consequential extensions were unsustainable and liable to be quashed. en-us Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Aug 2025 15:20:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463389 A valid enquiry into a society's affairs under Section 25 required a compliant complaint or a lawful suo motu process by the Registrar, followed by notice and enquiry; a complaint that did not meet those statutory preconditions was invalid. The Registrar's report was unlawful because no notice was issued to the society or its executive committee and no proper enquiry was conducted, contrary to Section 25, Rule 8 and natural justice. An administrator could not be appointed under Section 27A(1)(c) on the basis of such a defective report, so the supersession order and consequential extensions were unsustainable and liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463389