<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 49 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46149</link>
    <description>The statutory pre-deposit requirement operates as a condition precedent to hearing an excise appeal on merits, unless the appellate authority validly waives it. Where the appellants repeatedly failed to comply with deposit directions, the waiver request had already been rejected, earlier court directions remained unfulfilled, and no exceptional ground existed for writ interference. The petitions were therefore rejected, and the challenge to dismissal of the appeals for non-compliance with the deposit condition failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:54:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 49 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46149</link>
      <description>The statutory pre-deposit requirement operates as a condition precedent to hearing an excise appeal on merits, unless the appellate authority validly waives it. Where the appellants repeatedly failed to comply with deposit directions, the waiver request had already been rejected, earlier court directions remained unfulfilled, and no exceptional ground existed for writ interference. The petitions were therefore rejected, and the challenge to dismissal of the appeals for non-compliance with the deposit condition failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>