<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1648 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777460</link>
    <description>ITAT held the unilateral 50% disallowance of business expenses to be arbitrary and unsupported where the taxpayer reported a 33% net profit, the appellate authority conceded the expenditures were for business (granting 50% relief), books were not rejected under s.145(3), and the taxpayer furnished relevant details and evidence. On these facts, no business expenditure could be disallowed and the grounds raised by the taxpayer were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:58:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1648 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777460</link>
      <description>ITAT held the unilateral 50% disallowance of business expenses to be arbitrary and unsupported where the taxpayer reported a 33% net profit, the appellate authority conceded the expenditures were for business (granting 50% relief), books were not rejected under s.145(3), and the taxpayer furnished relevant details and evidence. On these facts, no business expenditure could be disallowed and the grounds raised by the taxpayer were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>