<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 156 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46144</link>
    <description>At the stay stage, waiver of pre-deposit depends on whether a prima facie case is shown and whether undue financial hardship is established. The Tribunal found that the petitioner failed on both counts, and the High Court saw no reason to interfere with the deposit amount. The request for waiver was therefore rejected and the deposit direction maintained, though time for compliance was extended.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 156 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46144</link>
      <description>At the stay stage, waiver of pre-deposit depends on whether a prima facie case is shown and whether undue financial hardship is established. The Tribunal found that the petitioner failed on both counts, and the High Court saw no reason to interfere with the deposit amount. The request for waiver was therefore rejected and the deposit direction maintained, though time for compliance was extended.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>