<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1644 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777456</link>
    <description>ITAT CHENNAI found denial of deduction under s.80IAC stemmed from non e-filing of Form No.10CCB despite the assessee filing RoI/audit report on 29.09.2022 and alleging technical glitches and an attempted timely physical filing which was refused. The Tribunal held the CIT(A) misdirected by applying precedent without considering these facts, set aside the CIT(A) order, and remitted the appeal to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:57:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1644 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777456</link>
      <description>ITAT CHENNAI found denial of deduction under s.80IAC stemmed from non e-filing of Form No.10CCB despite the assessee filing RoI/audit report on 29.09.2022 and alleging technical glitches and an attempted timely physical filing which was refused. The Tribunal held the CIT(A) misdirected by applying precedent without considering these facts, set aside the CIT(A) order, and remitted the appeal to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>