https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46143 A writ challenge to a preliminary anti-dumping finding was held not maintainable at the investigation stage where the statutory scheme provided an efficacious appeal or review remedy under the Customs Tariff Act. The Court interpreted Rule 6(2) as requiring forwarding of the public notice to known exporters, exporting governments and other interested parties, not personal service on importers, and found no established breach of natural justice. Because the preliminary finding did not finally prejudice the petitioners and the alternative remedy before the Tribunal remained available, writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate and the challenge failed. en-us Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:45:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46143 A writ challenge to a preliminary anti-dumping finding was held not maintainable at the investigation stage where the statutory scheme provided an efficacious appeal or review remedy under the Customs Tariff Act. The Court interpreted Rule 6(2) as requiring forwarding of the public notice to known exporters, exporting governments and other interested parties, not personal service on importers, and found no established breach of natural justice. Because the preliminary finding did not finally prejudice the petitioners and the alternative remedy before the Tribunal remained available, writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46143