https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777374 The HC refused to entertain petitions challenging two show-cause notices and consequent assessment orders for the same year, noting the petitioner-firm had appeared and been heard and had available alternate efficacious remedies in the form of statutory appeal/rectification procedures. The court held the petitions improper as an attempt to bypass the appellate hierarchy and avoid statutory payment obligations, relied on the SC's guidance that constitutional writ jurisdiction should not supplant available statutory appeals, and disposed of the petitions directing the petitioner-firm to pursue remedies before the appropriate authority. en-us Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777374 The HC refused to entertain petitions challenging two show-cause notices and consequent assessment orders for the same year, noting the petitioner-firm had appeared and been heard and had available alternate efficacious remedies in the form of statutory appeal/rectification procedures. The court held the petitions improper as an attempt to bypass the appellate hierarchy and avoid statutory payment obligations, relied on the SC's guidance that constitutional writ jurisdiction should not supplant available statutory appeals, and disposed of the petitions directing the petitioner-firm to pursue remedies before the appropriate authority. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777374