<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1583 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777395</link>
    <description>An assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section 263 was treated as consequential to the revisional order, so once the revisional order had been quashed, the challenge to that assessment order no longer survived and the appeal became infructuous. A parallel appeal arising from the same first appellate order and identical facts was treated as a duplicate filing with no separate cause of action, and it was also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1583 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777395</link>
      <description>An assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section 263 was treated as consequential to the revisional order, so once the revisional order had been quashed, the challenge to that assessment order no longer survived and the appeal became infructuous. A parallel appeal arising from the same first appellate order and identical facts was treated as a duplicate filing with no separate cause of action, and it was also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>