<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1587 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777399</link>
    <description>Peak cash credit assessed as unexplained under section 69A was examined against the assessee&#039;s claim that the deposits came from agricultural receipts in a joint family holding. With incomplete supporting details on landholding and the family share, and having regard to possible past savings and surrounding circumstances, the addition was not sustained in full. The matter was treated as suitable for reasonable estimation, and the addition was restricted to a lump sum, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1587 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777399</link>
      <description>Peak cash credit assessed as unexplained under section 69A was examined against the assessee&#039;s claim that the deposits came from agricultural receipts in a joint family holding. With incomplete supporting details on landholding and the family share, and having regard to possible past savings and surrounding circumstances, the addition was not sustained in full. The matter was treated as suitable for reasonable estimation, and the addition was restricted to a lump sum, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>