<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1588 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777400</link>
    <description>Cash deposits linked to an assessee&#039;s already accepted business turnover under section 44AD were treated as business receipts rather than unexplained credits or investments under sections 68 and 69. On that factual basis, the deposits were regarded as prima facie connected with the same business activity, so the presumptive rate was applied instead of adding them as unexplained income. The income from those deposits was therefore to be assessed at 8% as business receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1588 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777400</link>
      <description>Cash deposits linked to an assessee&#039;s already accepted business turnover under section 44AD were treated as business receipts rather than unexplained credits or investments under sections 68 and 69. On that factual basis, the deposits were regarded as prima facie connected with the same business activity, so the presumptive rate was applied instead of adding them as unexplained income. The income from those deposits was therefore to be assessed at 8% as business receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>