<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1592 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777404</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI-AT allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the disallowance under s.36(1)(va) read with s.2(24)(x) in intimation under s.143(1). The Tribunal held the issue was debatable and, in view of binding HC precedent favorable to the taxpayer, employee contributions to PF/ESI paid after statutory deposit dates but before the return-filing deadline were deductible; the AO therefore could not disallow them while processing the s.143(1) intimation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 10:29:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1592 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777404</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI-AT allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the disallowance under s.36(1)(va) read with s.2(24)(x) in intimation under s.143(1). The Tribunal held the issue was debatable and, in view of binding HC precedent favorable to the taxpayer, employee contributions to PF/ESI paid after statutory deposit dates but before the return-filing deadline were deductible; the AO therefore could not disallow them while processing the s.143(1) intimation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>