<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1602 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777414</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT held that the Pr. CIT&#039;s invocation of revisionary jurisdiction under s.263 was misconceived where it challenged claiming s.80G deductions from donations made from mandatory CSR funds. Relying on coordinate decisions, the Tribunal found such donations can qualify for s.80G deduction provided statutory conditions of s.80G are met. The s.263 order was quashed and the assessee&#039;s grounds of appeal were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1602 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777414</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT held that the Pr. CIT&#039;s invocation of revisionary jurisdiction under s.263 was misconceived where it challenged claiming s.80G deductions from donations made from mandatory CSR funds. Relying on coordinate decisions, the Tribunal found such donations can qualify for s.80G deduction provided statutory conditions of s.80G are met. The s.263 order was quashed and the assessee&#039;s grounds of appeal were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>