https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777435 HC quashed the impugned order and remitted the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration, finding that voluminous records allegedly filed earlier (16 volumes) had not been considered. The petitioner was directed to submit a fresh representation with a clear index detailing the documents in 16 volumes within 30 days of receipt of the order. The court held that the first appellate authority may examine and modify the order afresh. Petition disposed. en-us Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777435 HC quashed the impugned order and remitted the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration, finding that voluminous records allegedly filed earlier (16 volumes) had not been considered. The petitioner was directed to submit a fresh representation with a clear index detailing the documents in 16 volumes within 30 days of receipt of the order. The court held that the first appellate authority may examine and modify the order afresh. Petition disposed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777435