<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1626 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777438</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of by granting the petitioner permission to file a formal appeal against the second penalty order within fifteen days. The appellate authority was directed to consider the appeal on merits and in accordance with law, leaving the substantive challenge to be examined in the appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1626 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777438</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of by granting the petitioner permission to file a formal appeal against the second penalty order within fifteen days. The appellate authority was directed to consider the appeal on merits and in accordance with law, leaving the substantive challenge to be examined in the appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>