<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1638 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777450</link>
    <description>An adjudication under GST cannot exceed the scope or quantum set out in the show-cause notice, and no demand can be confirmed on grounds not specified in that notice. The High Court found that the impugned order travelled beyond the notice, particularly on penalty and interest, and that the taxpayer was not given an effective opportunity to respond before the order was passed. The order was therefore set aside for breach of Section 75(7), and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after allowing a response and hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1638 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777450</link>
      <description>An adjudication under GST cannot exceed the scope or quantum set out in the show-cause notice, and no demand can be confirmed on grounds not specified in that notice. The High Court found that the impugned order travelled beyond the notice, particularly on penalty and interest, and that the taxpayer was not given an effective opportunity to respond before the order was passed. The order was therefore set aside for breach of Section 75(7), and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after allowing a response and hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>