https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777451 HC dismissed the petition as premature, holding the petitioner must first respond to an elaborate show-cause notice concerning tax liability from a foreign construction contract. The court noted the petitioner established a foreign branch and completed the Mauritius project but failed to file a detailed reply and supporting documents with the assessing authority. The writ was refused with liberty to file a full reply and all supporting documents to the impugned show-cause notice within 30 days of receipt of the order. en-us Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777451 HC dismissed the petition as premature, holding the petitioner must first respond to an elaborate show-cause notice concerning tax liability from a foreign construction contract. The court noted the petitioner established a foreign branch and completed the Mauritius project but failed to file a detailed reply and supporting documents with the assessing authority. The writ was refused with liberty to file a full reply and all supporting documents to the impugned show-cause notice within 30 days of receipt of the order. Case-Laws GST Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777451