<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1640 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777452</link>
    <description>HC held that Section 93 of the GST Act does not permit issuance of a show-cause notice or tax determination against a deceased proprietor; liability arises only against the legal representative where business continues or is discontinued, and therefore notices and determination must be issued to the legal representative after affording opportunity to respond. The notice and determination issued solely against the deceased were invalid. Impugned order set aside and petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1640 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777452</link>
      <description>HC held that Section 93 of the GST Act does not permit issuance of a show-cause notice or tax determination against a deceased proprietor; liability arises only against the legal representative where business continues or is discontinued, and therefore notices and determination must be issued to the legal representative after affording opportunity to respond. The notice and determination issued solely against the deceased were invalid. Impugned order set aside and petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>