<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 137 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYD.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46130</link>
    <description>Natural justice in excise adjudication requires disclosure of documents that may support the defence, even if they were not specifically relied upon in the show cause notice, and witnesses examined by the Department and relied on in adjudication must be made available for cross-examination. Applying fair play principles, the Court directed supply of the requested documents and granted an opportunity to cross-examine the departmental witnesses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:07:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 137 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYD.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46130</link>
      <description>Natural justice in excise adjudication requires disclosure of documents that may support the defence, even if they were not specifically relied upon in the show cause notice, and witnesses examined by the Department and relied on in adjudication must be made available for cross-examination. Applying fair play principles, the Court directed supply of the requested documents and granted an opportunity to cross-examine the departmental witnesses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>