<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 111 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46117</link>
    <description>A demand under Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 cannot stand unless a contravention of Rule 9(1), such as removal of excisable goods without duty, is established; here, no finding of clandestine removal was recorded, so the demand failed. Furnace oil used to generate steam and electricity during the plant&#039;s annual shut-down, including maintenance and overhauling, was treated as integrally connected with manufacture and therefore as use in the manufacture of the final product. On that basis, the oil remained eligible for concessional duty, and the Revenue&#039;s reference was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:58:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 111 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46117</link>
      <description>A demand under Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 cannot stand unless a contravention of Rule 9(1), such as removal of excisable goods without duty, is established; here, no finding of clandestine removal was recorded, so the demand failed. Furnace oil used to generate steam and electricity during the plant&#039;s annual shut-down, including maintenance and overhauling, was treated as integrally connected with manufacture and therefore as use in the manufacture of the final product. On that basis, the oil remained eligible for concessional duty, and the Revenue&#039;s reference was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>