<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1470 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777282</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, holding that cenvat credit on input services used in construction of a commercial complex is admissible where the complex is subsequently rented and service tax is discharged on renting of immovable property. The Tribunal followed precedent establishing that inputs, capital goods and input services used to construct buildings later rented bear nexus to the output service, and denial of credit solely because construction preceded renting is not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1470 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777282</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, holding that cenvat credit on input services used in construction of a commercial complex is admissible where the complex is subsequently rented and service tax is discharged on renting of immovable property. The Tribunal followed precedent establishing that inputs, capital goods and input services used to construct buildings later rented bear nexus to the output service, and denial of credit solely because construction preceded renting is not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>