https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777285 Appeal allowed by AT: the AA's attachment confirmation was modified and delay condoned under Section 14; appellants treated as bona fide purchasers without collusion. The Tribunal found ED/IO/EO negligent for failing to take possession, affix conspicuous notice, or publish attachment as required by rules, and for not preventing sales, resulting in third-party transactions and significant lender exposure. Appellants' challenge via HC led to direction to file appeal; appeals deemed timely from date of knowledge and decided in favour of appellants against Respondent ED. en-us Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777285 Appeal allowed by AT: the AA's attachment confirmation was modified and delay condoned under Section 14; appellants treated as bona fide purchasers without collusion. The Tribunal found ED/IO/EO negligent for failing to take possession, affix conspicuous notice, or publish attachment as required by rules, and for not preventing sales, resulting in third-party transactions and significant lender exposure. Appellants' challenge via HC led to direction to file appeal; appeals deemed timely from date of knowledge and decided in favour of appellants against Respondent ED. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777285