https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777289 NCLAT, PB New Delhi dismissed the application to condone a 149-day refiling delay, finding no sufficient or reasonable cause. The tribunal held IBC timelines are paramount and refused to accept geographic distance or e-filing constraints without specific logistical proof, and rejected a counsel-illness claim for lack of medical evidence. The bench found gross negligence by the litigant and counsel in curing procedural defects, noted likely prejudice to ongoing liquidation, and declined to disturb the process by allowing the delay. en-us Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777289 NCLAT, PB New Delhi dismissed the application to condone a 149-day refiling delay, finding no sufficient or reasonable cause. The tribunal held IBC timelines are paramount and refused to accept geographic distance or e-filing constraints without specific logistical proof, and rejected a counsel-illness claim for lack of medical evidence. The bench found gross negligence by the litigant and counsel in curing procedural defects, noted likely prejudice to ongoing liquidation, and declined to disturb the process by allowing the delay. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777289