<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1478 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777290</link>
    <description>NCLAT (PB, New Delhi) allowed a single 45-day extension of the CIRP period to enable completion of final submissions, voting and placement of any approved resolution plan before the adjudicating authority, noting that six resolution applicants were active and that earlier requests for a 90-day extension had been refused. The bench found the 45-day extension appropriate as a final period after which no further extension will be entertained; the appeal was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1478 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777290</link>
      <description>NCLAT (PB, New Delhi) allowed a single 45-day extension of the CIRP period to enable completion of final submissions, voting and placement of any approved resolution plan before the adjudicating authority, noting that six resolution applicants were active and that earlier requests for a 90-day extension had been refused. The bench found the 45-day extension appropriate as a final period after which no further extension will be entertained; the appeal was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>