<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1490 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777302</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the SLP as withdrawn. The matter involved alleged planting of commercial-quantity contraband and violations of Sections 8/23, NDPS Act; the HC had refused bail on the ground that the threshold under Section 37, NDPS Act was not crossed. Complaints included delay in filing Section 52A, defective notice and prolonged proceedings, but the HC&#039;s conclusion denying bail remained undisturbed, and the petition for special leave was formally withdrawn and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1490 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777302</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the SLP as withdrawn. The matter involved alleged planting of commercial-quantity contraband and violations of Sections 8/23, NDPS Act; the HC had refused bail on the ground that the threshold under Section 37, NDPS Act was not crossed. Complaints included delay in filing Section 52A, defective notice and prolonged proceedings, but the HC&#039;s conclusion denying bail remained undisturbed, and the petition for special leave was formally withdrawn and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>