<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1497 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777309</link>
    <description>ITAT (Patna) allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, finding the income enhancement under section 143(1) arose from a machine-driven discrepancy between the exemption claimed in the return and Form 9A. The tribunal held that the automated 143(1) process cannot be expected to apply independent judgment and directed remand to CIT(A) to reassess and correct figures, ensuring the assessee receives any relief due under law for the inadvertent omission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1497 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777309</link>
      <description>ITAT (Patna) allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, finding the income enhancement under section 143(1) arose from a machine-driven discrepancy between the exemption claimed in the return and Form 9A. The tribunal held that the automated 143(1) process cannot be expected to apply independent judgment and directed remand to CIT(A) to reassess and correct figures, ensuring the assessee receives any relief due under law for the inadvertent omission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>