<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1510 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777322</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 147 was invalid where it was initiated solely on the alleged taxability of management charges as fees for technical services under the India-UK DTAA, and the very addition made on that basis was later deleted in appeal. Once the income that triggered the reopening was held not taxable and that deletion attained finality, the jurisdictional foundation for reassessment disappeared. The reassessment order was therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1510 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777322</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 147 was invalid where it was initiated solely on the alleged taxability of management charges as fees for technical services under the India-UK DTAA, and the very addition made on that basis was later deleted in appeal. Once the income that triggered the reopening was held not taxable and that deletion attained finality, the jurisdictional foundation for reassessment disappeared. The reassessment order was therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>