<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1517 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777329</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the appellate authority&#039;s application of a 12.5% gross profit rate to assess unaccounted sales, rejecting the assessee&#039;s contention to apply a 3.1% net profit rate. The tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s order reasoned and speaking, holding that gross profit - not net profit - is the appropriate benchmark for assessing undisclosed transactions, and dismissed the assessee&#039;s comparative turnover, gross profit and net profit chart as lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1517 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777329</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the appellate authority&#039;s application of a 12.5% gross profit rate to assess unaccounted sales, rejecting the assessee&#039;s contention to apply a 3.1% net profit rate. The tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s order reasoned and speaking, holding that gross profit - not net profit - is the appropriate benchmark for assessing undisclosed transactions, and dismissed the assessee&#039;s comparative turnover, gross profit and net profit chart as lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>