<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1522 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777334</link>
    <description>ITAT (Bangalore) allowed the appeal and deleted the late fee levied under section 234E for Q2-Q4 of FY 2012-13, holding the levy prior to 1.6.2015 was without authority of law. The tribunal followed the jurisdictional HC&#039;s view that although s.234E was inserted in 2012, it became operational only after the prospective amendment to s.200A(1)(c) effective 1.6.2015 enabling processing/charging; absent that machinery provision earlier levies cannot stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1522 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777334</link>
      <description>ITAT (Bangalore) allowed the appeal and deleted the late fee levied under section 234E for Q2-Q4 of FY 2012-13, holding the levy prior to 1.6.2015 was without authority of law. The tribunal followed the jurisdictional HC&#039;s view that although s.234E was inserted in 2012, it became operational only after the prospective amendment to s.200A(1)(c) effective 1.6.2015 enabling processing/charging; absent that machinery provision earlier levies cannot stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>