<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1537 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777349</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petition, quashed the Appellate Authority&#039;s order refusing the appeal for non-payment of the pre-deposit in cash, and restored the appeal. The court held that a pre-deposit made through the electronic credit ledger qualifies under Section 107(6)(b) of the CGST Act and is valid for entertaining the appeal, relying on a similar decision of another HC which set aside a comparable refusal to accept electronic payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 16:41:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1537 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777349</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petition, quashed the Appellate Authority&#039;s order refusing the appeal for non-payment of the pre-deposit in cash, and restored the appeal. The court held that a pre-deposit made through the electronic credit ledger qualifies under Section 107(6)(b) of the CGST Act and is valid for entertaining the appeal, relying on a similar decision of another HC which set aside a comparable refusal to accept electronic payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>