<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1540 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777352</link>
    <description>An order confirming GST tax, interest and penalty cannot exceed the amount or grounds stated in the show-cause notice, as Section 75(7) requires strict correspondence between the notice and the final demand. Where the notice did not validly cover the full demand, including penalty and interest, and the noticee was not given an effective opportunity to respond, the demand order is unsustainable and is liable to be quashed with remand for fresh adjudication after hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1540 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777352</link>
      <description>An order confirming GST tax, interest and penalty cannot exceed the amount or grounds stated in the show-cause notice, as Section 75(7) requires strict correspondence between the notice and the final demand. Where the notice did not validly cover the full demand, including penalty and interest, and the noticee was not given an effective opportunity to respond, the demand order is unsustainable and is liable to be quashed with remand for fresh adjudication after hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>