https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777355 HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned orders dated 3.9.2024 and 23.6.2023, holding that notices and order uploaded under the GST portal's "Additional Notices & Orders" tab did not defeat remedy where the issue is settled by precedent. Relying on prior Division Bench decisions, the Court found no useful purpose in prolonging proceedings because the disputed amount is deposited with the State and there is no outstanding demand; consequently the delay doctrine and power to condone delay under s.107 GST did not prevent relief. en-us Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777355 HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned orders dated 3.9.2024 and 23.6.2023, holding that notices and order uploaded under the GST portal's "Additional Notices & Orders" tab did not defeat remedy where the issue is settled by precedent. Relying on prior Division Bench decisions, the Court found no useful purpose in prolonging proceedings because the disputed amount is deposited with the State and there is no outstanding demand; consequently the delay doctrine and power to condone delay under s.107 GST did not prevent relief. Case-Laws GST Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777355