<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1357 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463344</link>
    <description>Challenges to a society&#039;s registered bye-law amendments and alleged financial irregularities require civil adjudication where they depend on disputed facts. Registration of an amendment under the Tamil Nadu Societies and Registration Act is treated as conclusive evidence of due registration, and no admitted procedural breach was identified. Allegations concerning the absence of a special resolution, suppression of facts, prior proceedings, participation in meetings and financial misconduct cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction. A writ of mandamus to appoint a Special Officer and supersede the office bearers was therefore unavailable; the aggrieved party must pursue remedies before the Civil Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 19:01:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1357 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463344</link>
      <description>Challenges to a society&#039;s registered bye-law amendments and alleged financial irregularities require civil adjudication where they depend on disputed facts. Registration of an amendment under the Tamil Nadu Societies and Registration Act is treated as conclusive evidence of due registration, and no admitted procedural breach was identified. Allegations concerning the absence of a special resolution, suppression of facts, prior proceedings, participation in meetings and financial misconduct cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction. A writ of mandamus to appoint a Special Officer and supersede the office bearers was therefore unavailable; the aggrieved party must pursue remedies before the Civil Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>