<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2057 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463348</link>
    <description>CESTAT held that cenvat credit could not be denied where the record showed no investigation establishing non-receipt of inputs and Revenue produced no evidence contradicting the appellants&#039; claim that inputs were used in dutiable final products. The tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) orders, found denial of credit to be based on assumption, and allowed the appeals, permitting the appellants to retain the cenvat credit already availed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 19:01:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2057 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463348</link>
      <description>CESTAT held that cenvat credit could not be denied where the record showed no investigation establishing non-receipt of inputs and Revenue produced no evidence contradicting the appellants&#039; claim that inputs were used in dutiable final products. The tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) orders, found denial of credit to be based on assumption, and allowed the appeals, permitting the appellants to retain the cenvat credit already availed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>