<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 134 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46086</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition and directed the petitioner to approach CEGAT Chennai Bench for transferring the appeal to Bangalore Bench. The judgment aimed to uphold fairness in the appeal process, ensuring justice is not only done but also seen to be done. Consequently, the connected WMPS were also dismissed without costs, concluding the legal proceedings in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 134 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46086</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition and directed the petitioner to approach CEGAT Chennai Bench for transferring the appeal to Bangalore Bench. The judgment aimed to uphold fairness in the appeal process, ensuring justice is not only done but also seen to be done. Consequently, the connected WMPS were also dismissed without costs, concluding the legal proceedings in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>