<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal allowed: Leasing foreign ISO tankers deemed transfer of right to use goods, not taxable tangible goods service</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91943</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal of the Appellant, holding that leases of ISO tankers from foreign lessors did not constitute a taxable &quot;Tangible Goods Service&quot; under the impugned period but amounted to a deemed sale. The Tribunal found the legal right to use, possession, control of usage and maintenance rested exclusively with the Appellant, evidencing a transfer of right to use goods tantamount to transfer of goods for taxation purposes. Consequently, the reverse charge treatment as taxable service was inappropriate and the assessments under service tax were set aside, resulting in the appeals being allowed in favor of the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:41:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:41:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal allowed: Leasing foreign ISO tankers deemed transfer of right to use goods, not taxable tangible goods service</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91943</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal of the Appellant, holding that leases of ISO tankers from foreign lessors did not constitute a taxable &quot;Tangible Goods Service&quot; under the impugned period but amounted to a deemed sale. The Tribunal found the legal right to use, possession, control of usage and maintenance rested exclusively with the Appellant, evidencing a transfer of right to use goods tantamount to transfer of goods for taxation purposes. Consequently, the reverse charge treatment as taxable service was inappropriate and the assessments under service tax were set aside, resulting in the appeals being allowed in favor of the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:41:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>