<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1401 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777213</link>
    <description>CESTAT held that leases of ISO tanks from overseas suppliers constituted a transfer of right to use with possession and control passing to the lessee, and therefore did not amount to &quot;Tangible Goods Services&quot; attractable to service tax under the reverse charge during the impugned period. Applying the ratio in similar precedent, the tribunal concluded the transactions amounted to deemed sale and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:41:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1401 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777213</link>
      <description>CESTAT held that leases of ISO tanks from overseas suppliers constituted a transfer of right to use with possession and control passing to the lessee, and therefore did not amount to &quot;Tangible Goods Services&quot; attractable to service tax under the reverse charge during the impugned period. Applying the ratio in similar precedent, the tribunal concluded the transactions amounted to deemed sale and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>