https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777218 A director's challenge to attachment was not maintainable where no property standing in his name was attached and no direct prejudice was shown. The tribunal also upheld provisional attachment of the hotel company's bank account to the extent of the marriage booking amount, because the payment came from the accused group, the claimed cancellation or forfeiture was not supported by any contemporaneous written proof, and the money continued to bear the character of tainted funds. The attached amount was therefore permitted to remain in the account pending trial. en-us Mon, 07 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:41:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777218 A director's challenge to attachment was not maintainable where no property standing in his name was attached and no direct prejudice was shown. The tribunal also upheld provisional attachment of the hotel company's bank account to the extent of the marriage booking amount, because the payment came from the accused group, the claimed cancellation or forfeiture was not supported by any contemporaneous written proof, and the money continued to bear the character of tainted funds. The attached amount was therefore permitted to remain in the account pending trial. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 07 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777218