<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1408 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777220</link>
    <description>Regular bail in a money-laundering case should not be cancelled merely because serious allegations remain pending; cancellation requires post-release misuse of liberty or other supervening circumstances. Where the witness statement had already been recorded, the accused remained in judicial custody during investigation, the supplementary complaint had been filed, and the material had crystallised before bail was granted, the apprehended risk of tampering or interference was treated as substantially addressed. In the absence of any post-bail conduct showing abuse of liberty, the request to cancel bail was rejected and the bail order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:41:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1408 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777220</link>
      <description>Regular bail in a money-laundering case should not be cancelled merely because serious allegations remain pending; cancellation requires post-release misuse of liberty or other supervening circumstances. Where the witness statement had already been recorded, the accused remained in judicial custody during investigation, the supplementary complaint had been filed, and the material had crystallised before bail was granted, the apprehended risk of tampering or interference was treated as substantially addressed. In the absence of any post-bail conduct showing abuse of liberty, the request to cancel bail was rejected and the bail order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>