https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777244 ITAT set aside the CIT(A)/NFAC order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, holding that the appellate authority erred by merely remanding the reassessment to the AO without deciding each ground of appeal. The ITAT noted reassessment arose from large bank transactions, an unverified return treated as invalid and an ex parte assessment after non-appearance. Under s.250(6) the CIT(A)/NFAC was required to issue a reasoned, speaking order addressing all grounds, including legal objections to the notices and reassessment, and failure to do so violated natural justice. en-us Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:41:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777244 ITAT set aside the CIT(A)/NFAC order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, holding that the appellate authority erred by merely remanding the reassessment to the AO without deciding each ground of appeal. The ITAT noted reassessment arose from large bank transactions, an unverified return treated as invalid and an ex parte assessment after non-appearance. Under s.250(6) the CIT(A)/NFAC was required to issue a reasoned, speaking order addressing all grounds, including legal objections to the notices and reassessment, and failure to do so violated natural justice. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777244