<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1445 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777257</link>
    <description>Petitioners challenged demands for unremitted TDS where employers deducted tax from their salaries but failed to deposit it. The SC declined to entertain the claim under Article 136, noting the HC had found the deductions undisputed and no justification for treating the demands as outstanding against the petitioners. The Court refused to exercise discretionary jurisdiction and dismissed the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 10:25:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1445 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777257</link>
      <description>Petitioners challenged demands for unremitted TDS where employers deducted tax from their salaries but failed to deposit it. The SC declined to entertain the claim under Article 136, noting the HC had found the deductions undisputed and no justification for treating the demands as outstanding against the petitioners. The Court refused to exercise discretionary jurisdiction and dismissed the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>