<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1701 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463339</link>
    <description>Late furnishing of Form 67 was treated as a curable procedural defect and not, by itself, a complete bar to foreign tax credit. The appellate order was set aside because the Department did not dispute that substantive entitlement still required examination, and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification of Form 67 and related details before allowing the credit, if otherwise admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 20:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1701 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463339</link>
      <description>Late furnishing of Form 67 was treated as a curable procedural defect and not, by itself, a complete bar to foreign tax credit. The appellate order was set aside because the Department did not dispute that substantive entitlement still required examination, and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification of Form 67 and related details before allowing the credit, if otherwise admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>